“Active voice,” Keith, not “active tense”

Salvia Greggeii
Keith Olbermann in commenting on Gingrich’s political “double gaffe,” said: “He (Gingrich) even used the active tense in his apology.”
What Olbermann meant to say was active voice. “Voice inflects a verb to show whether its subject is the doer of the action indicated or is acted upon.” (John B. Opdycke, Harper’s English Grammar). Olbermann was pointing out that Gingrich, instead of inflecting attention away from his gaffe by saying something like, “…poor judgement was made” or words that effect, said, “I made a poor statement” or words to that effect.
Very accurate of Olberman to catch this fine point. It indicates that Gingrich was well-aware of his blunder, but he did mean active voice, not tense. If Olbermann had meant tense, (time of action), surely it was too late for Gingrich.
Tags: keith olbermann, newt gingrich, tense, voice
One Person has left comments on this post
Hi, Congratulations to the site owner for this marvelous work you’ve done. It has lots of useful and interesting data.
You must be logged in to post a comment.